Because my work focuses on unpacking social mechanisms in career and firm contexts, the main organizing principle linking my research is theoretical rather than topical. It stretches into empirical fields such as beer      , jazz      , or divorce     .  

AOM 2019

Employees in small, young firms have roughly 15% higher rates of divorce

Couples with job alignment have lower divorce hazards

Additional alignment advantage for couples with startup jobs

Startups and divorce

Young ventures (small young and large young firm types) function as hotbeds of divorce

with Michael S. Dahl and Olav Sorenson


We argue for an organizational perspective on the relationship between professional and personal lives, proposing in particular that more stable organizations, those characterized by higher levels of bureaucracy, engender lower levels of marital instability among their employees. Consistent with this expectation, we find that startup employees have higher divorce rates compared to the employees of more established organizations. These results hold even when estimated using instrumental variables to account for selection into startup employment. But couple matching also matters. Couples in which both individuals work for startups – even if different ones – have some of the lowest levels of divorce. 


Read the working paper (09/2019 version) here. For a more recent version, please get in touch. 


Network tension as conjuncture of dyadic collaborations

Link between network tension and six measures of innovative performance

Network tension and innovation in teams

Network tension predicts creative team success more so than brokerage

with Balázs Vedres

Innovative teams face the paradox of relying on experience to generate novelty.  We argue that network tension – the lack of closure with strong ties – helps teams to recognize and implement successful novel combinations, more so than brokerage, and closed ties. Prior scholarship has neglected the creative potential of open and strong relationships because it assumed that strong ties are always closed, and only weak ties bridge diverse structural locations.  We develop two, graph level measures of tension: the relative frequency and strength of strong, open triads.  Using data on the entire history of recorded jazz, with 175 064 sessions from more than a century, we show that network tension is more prevalent than expected under a configuration model.  While tension is a predictor of several success measures, including deep success, brokerage and closure are not.  We also measure the structural availability of tension to each session using computational methods and show that unexpected tension has an additional contribution to deep success. We discuss implications for project teams and organizations where innovation is crucial.

Read the working paper (03/2021 version) on SocArXiv.


Who distributes craft beer?

Wholesalers able to leverage positional strategies locally and overcome relationship lock-in

with Ingo Kleindienst 


We identify which specific types of wholesalers were distributing products from an increasingly important niche segment of the beer industry, namely craft beer. As traditional recommendations of the strategy literature disregard lock-ins from previous market ties are present, we introduce the notion of social buffering to indicate the embeddedness of organizations into their history of cumulative relationships. We use longitudinal data on distributor establishments and their local portfolio composition between 1997–2016 from three different U.S. states. Our results reveal that it is distributors that are able both to leverage positional strategies in their local portfolios and free themselves from the lock-in associated with their historically beneficial social and market relationships with the large brewers who distribute craft.

Read the working paper (06/2019 version) on SSRN or SocArXiv. For a more recent version, please get in touch.

Craft in distributor portfolios

Wholesaler consolidation

Crashing the momentum 

Industry push

Change in the social logic of market relationships

Multiunit new entrant survival advantage, conditioned on the competitive landscape

Survival among U.S. beer wholesalers

When Liability Becomes Potential

This paper focuses on an intermediary market segment and examines what happens to incumbents and entrants when there is a surge in the number of potential downstream partners. While focusing on two structural constraints, organizational structure and competitive pressure, I build off of the fact that in the past thirty years in the U.S. beer industry, as the number of beer producers (i.e. brewers) proliferated, their intermediaries (i.e. wholesalers) declined. I examine the effect of this evolutionary dynamic and the inter-organizational relationship-level mechanism it induces on the variation in survival chances of different forms of establishments in the wholesaling industry. I use restricted-access economic microdata from the Longitudinal Business Database (1983-2013). I find that multi-unit entrants have better survival chances than industry incumbents, an effect I term ‘the potential of newness’. Furthermore, I show that survival benefits especially accrue to these newcomers in areas with competition-laden history and where the industry experiences shakeouts. I explain this counterintuitive finding via a social mechanism: in dynamic market contexts, it is easier to create entirely new market ties than change old, socially embedded ones.

Read earlier iterations of the working paper on IDEAS RePEc or SSRN. For a more recent version, please get in touch.

The spatial factor in craft brewer firm strategies

"The Beer We Brew": how the competitive landscape influences firms' product strategy 

with Paul-Brian McInerney


This paper looks at heterogeneity in colocation patterns for distinct classes of organizations within the same industry.  We find three distinct classes of craft breweries using latent class analysis: established, up-and-coming and innovator. Members of the innovator class tend to locate in dense markets near established organizations while up-and-coming firms use the strategies developed by the established class but in new geographic locales. We theorize that these patterns are a case of partitioning within the partition: innovators locate near established firms in order to serve consumers with sophisticated or adventurous palates who are not being serviced by the established craft brewers. 

Read the book chapter in Untapped edited volume

Firm colocation

Product strategies: established, innovator, or